Trac is being migrated to new services! Issues can be found in our new
YouTrack instance and WIKI pages can be found on our
website.
- Timestamp:
-
Apr 5, 2008, 11:13:00 PM (16 years ago)
- Author:
-
Sim-on
- Comment:
-
added some icq-defect-links
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
|
v46
|
v47
|
|
| 41 | 41 | Our ICQ implementation in the OSCAR code is substandard: |
| 42 | 42 | * We do not have full support for ICQ's: |
| 43 | | * status |
| 44 | | * privacy |
| 45 | | * message formatting |
| | 43 | * status (#582, #703, #766, #4981) |
| | 44 | * privacy (#1009, #466) |
| | 45 | * message formatting (#3271) |
| 46 | 46 | * Buddy list management is suboptimal |
| 47 | | * Message size restrictions are likely wrong |
| | 47 | * Message size restrictions are likely wrong (#4628) |
| 48 | 48 | Your goal is to compare what libpurple does at a protocol level with what the official Windows ICQ client does, figure out where it differs, and to repair libpurple's implementation, extending Pidgin's, Finch's, and libpurple's capabilities where possible or necessary. |
| 49 | 49 | |
All information, including names and email addresses, entered onto this website or sent to mailing lists affiliated with this website will be public. Do not post confidential information, especially passwords!
